HB 3155
Permits a person to operate Class I, Class III and Class IV all-terrain vehicles on highways that are not interstate highways if the all-terrain vehicle meets vehicle equipment standards and the all-terrain vehicle is registered.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
99%
Oppose
1%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill allows people to operate certain all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) – specifically Class I, Class III, and Class IV – on non-interstate highways. To do so, the ATV must meet specific equipment standards and be registered. The Department of Transportation will also be able to offer optional registration for these ATVs if they can demonstrate compliance with equipment standards. The bill also updates regulations regarding unlawful operation of off-road vehicles and registration requirements.
Key provisions
- ATVs (Class I, III, and IV) can be operated on non-interstate highways if they meet equipment standards and are registered.
- The Department of Transportation can offer optional registration for these ATVs with proof of equipment compliance.
- Updates regulations regarding unlawful operation of off-road vehicles, specifically targeting snowmobiles and certain ATV classes.
- Clarifies registration requirements for all-terrain vehicles, including a new process for demonstrating equipment standards.
- Addresses penalties for unlawful operation of off-road vehicles, classifying it as a Class B traffic violation.
- Modifies the requirements for displaying slow-moving vehicle emblems on ATVs operating on highways.
Who is affected
- Vehicle owners and operators
- The Department of Transportation
- Motorists on highways
- ATV enthusiasts
- Oregon residents
Notable changes
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of the bill advocate for allowing all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) to operate on non-interstate highways, citing benefits for rural areas and outdoor enthusiasts. They emphasize the importance of increased accessibility for work purposes, tourism, and recreational activities, as well as improved access to public lands and basic services in remote communities. Many that meeting safety standards and proper registration would enhance the safety of these vehicles on public roads. Some also highlight economic benefits, such as generating revenue through licensing fees and boosting local economies. Additionally, supporters argue that allowing ATVs on roadways could provide a convenient and cost-effective way for people to get around in rural areas, adding an exciting new dimension to their use.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of House Bill 3155 express concerns that the legislation lacks consideration for local autonomy, traffic safety, and community livability. Many that allowing ATVs on Oregon's road system would lead to negative consequences, including increased risk of accidents, noise pollution, and resource degradation. They also emphasize the need for dedicated trail use areas for OHV activities, citing issues with lawlessness, safety, and environmental protection when vehicles are allowed on public lands. Furthermore, some concerns about the bill's potential impact on road safety, insurance requirements, and quiet outdoor activities like hiking and skiing, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the long-term effects of the proposed legislation.