HB 3170
Modifies the definitions of and grant requirements for Resilience Hubs and Resilience Networks.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
99%
Oppose
1%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill modifies the definitions of Resilience Hubs and Resilience Networks, clarifying their roles in community disaster preparedness and response. It establishes requirements for these facilities to provide resources like food, water, and communication during emergencies. The bill also directs the Department of Human Services to provide grants to support the creation and operation of these hubs and networks, prioritizing vulnerable communities and ensuring they are resilient to various threats.
Key provisions
- Defines ‘Resilience Hub’ as a physical facility supporting community needs and enhancing disaster response.
- Defines ‘Resilience Network’ as a collaborative network of resources and providers supporting community resilience.
- Requires Resilience Hubs and Networks to provide services like food distribution, communication, and shelter.
- Directs the Department of Human Services to provide grants for planning, operation, and equipment for Resilience Hubs and Networks.
- Mandates that grant applications include plans for community resilience and service provision to vulnerable populations.
- Requires the Department of Human Services to consult with the State Department of Energy and the Oregon Health Authority when awarding grants.
- Authorizes Resilience Hubs and Networks to provide heating, cooling, and weather protection.
- Specifies that Resilience Hubs and Networks must accommodate individuals with accessibility needs.
Who is affected
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsor
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of resiliency hubs emphasize the need for vital resources to vulnerable populations during extreme weather events. They advocate for increased funding to establish and maintain these hubs, which provide essential supplies, clean air, and shelter to communities disproportionately affected by disasters. The proposed legislation, HB3170, is seen as a critical step in addressing climate change and promoting sustainable energy practices, with supporters citing its potential to protect Oregon communities from climate-related disasters. Additionally, advocates highlight the importance of inclusivity and accessibility, emphasizing that leaving people outside in the elements is unacceptable and that resilience hubs can help address socioeconomic disparities by providing safe spaces for communities to cope with disasters.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 3170 express concerns that the proposed funding for a Resilience Network is unwarranted, citing the need for additional taxpayer resources to monitor grant disbursements. They also raise red flags about potential corruption and misuse of funds, suggesting that the program's lack of transparency and accountability could lead to inefficiencies and abuse. Furthermore, they argue that the network's purpose and goals are unclear, casting doubt on its necessity and effectiveness in addressing community resilience needs.