HB 3171
Changes the requirements for an energy resilience plan that a county develops under the Act.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
83%
Oppose
17%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill updates the requirements for county energy resilience plans, which are designed to help communities prepare for and recover from power outages. It expands the information that counties must include in their plans, such as identifying critical public services facilities and vulnerable communities. The bill also extends a grant program that helps counties develop these plans and declares an emergency, allowing the law to take effect immediately.
Key provisions
- Expands the information required in county energy resilience plans to include critical public services facilities, vulnerable communities, and potential locations for community resilience centers.
- Requires counties to incorporate their energy resilience plans into their natural hazard mitigation plans.
- Extends the grant program for counties to develop energy resilience plans.
- Mandates that counties consult with local environmental justice communities when developing plans.
- Requires counties to identify time schedules and potential funding sources for developing energy resilience.
- Establishes a process for electric and natural gas utilities to assist counties with information requests regarding energy infrastructure.
- Clarifies the definition of ‘critical public services facility’.
- Sets a deadline for the Department of Energy to submit a report on the grant program’s progress.
Who is affected
- Counties in Oregon
- Electric and natural gas utilities
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsor
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of extending the performance period for the Energy Resilience Plan project believe it will yield more valuable experiences and outcomes for counties and the state. The Multnomah County Office of Sustainability, as well as several individuals, support House Bill 3171, which would amend county energy resilience plans to make them more attainable for large-population counties like Multnomah. Proponents argue that this bill is crucial for strengthening Oregon's commitment to energy resilience, particularly in rural communities often affected by power disruptions, and improving local preparedness efforts through extended grant funding. Additionally, the Association of Oregon Counties supports removing mapping requirements to enable more counties to participate in the grant process, further expanding the reach of the County Energy Resilience Program.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Several ed concerns that HB 3171's provisions for promoting residential housing growth in environmentally sensitive areas would lead to the destruction of valuable farmlands and forested areas. They argue that the bill does not provide a clear or sufficient funding source to support these efforts, raising questions about its feasibility and potential environmental impact. Critics also contend that the bill's focus on economic development over environmental protection may compromise the long-term sustainability of these areas, ultimately harming local ecosystems and communities that depend on them.