HB 3224
Requires the Department of Human Services to review the statutes of this state to identify all instances of required background checks under certain statutes and similarities and differences in the different background checks, and report on options to consolidate and reduce the number of different background checks for similar purposes or programs.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
31%
Oppose
69%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill directs the Department of Human Services to examine Oregon’s laws regarding background checks. The department will identify any similarities or differences between various background check requirements and explore ways to combine or reduce the number of checks when they serve similar purposes. The department must submit a report with recommendations to the Legislative Assembly by September 15, 2026.
Key provisions
- The Department of Human Services must review state statutes related to background checks.
- The department will analyze similarities and differences in existing background checks.
- The department is tasked with identifying opportunities to consolidate background checks.
- The department must reduce the number of redundant background checks.
- The department must submit a report to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly.
- The report deadline is September 15, 2026.
Who is affected
- Department of Human Services
- Legislative Assembly
- State Agencies Conducting Background Checks
- Individuals Subject to Background Checks
Notable changes
- The bill mandates a review of existing background check statutes.
- It seeks to streamline the background check process across state agencies.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Hoa Nguyen
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of House Bill 3224 agree that Oregon's current background check system is inefficient and causes unnecessary barriers for workers, particularly in the social service and childcare sectors. They argue that streamlining the process will improve efficiency, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance access to critical services for vulnerable Oregonians. The bill aims to address these issues by modernizing the system while maintaining consumer safety, with a focus on supporting the behavioral health workforce, reducing delays, and increasing portability for Direct Support Professionals. By simplifying background checks, supporters believe that childcare will become more accessible, and essential services can be delivered without gaps in care, ultimately benefiting Oregon's most vulnerable populations.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 3224 express concerns about the balance between public safety and individual rights, arguing that the bill's provisions could infringe on personal information without clear evidence. Many the legislation is unnecessary and does not address a universal issue, instead being tailored to specific circumstances or targeting vulnerable populations. Some argue that removing prohibition on criminal history checks would compromise safety and privacy, while others believe the current system is sufficient to address problems caused by criminal illegals. Additionally, opponents highlight potential funding issues, varying background check requirements across departments, and privacy concerns related to personal information sharing, suggesting that an expanded study of background checks could infringe on the privacy of all Oregonians.