HB 3369
Authorizes the State Treasurer to issue Article XI-Q general obligation bonds to finance expansion of courthouses.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2025 Regular Session
Committee
Emergency Management, General Government, and Veterans
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill authorizes the Oregon State Treasurer to issue general obligation bonds to finance the expansion or renovation of courthouses. Specifically, the bonds can be used for projects that address significant structural defects, create opportunities for courthouse colocation, or involve expanding existing facilities. The bill also outlines agreements between counties and the state for funding courthouse projects, potentially requiring counties to contribute a portion of the project costs.
Key provisions
- Authorizes the State Treasurer to issue Article XI-Q general obligation bonds.
- Bonds can be used for courthouse expansion or renovation due to structural defects or colocation opportunities.
- Projects must be approved by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Oregon Department of Administrative Services.
- Allows for interim agreements between counties and the state for courthouse funding.
- Counties may contribute to projects through property taxes, bond proceeds, or credits for land or space acquisition.
- Establishes the Oregon Courthouse Capital Construction and Improvement Fund.
- Interest earned on the fund is credited back to the fund.
- The fund is continuously appropriated to the Judicial Department.
Who is affected
- State of Oregon
- Counties in Oregon
- Judicial Department
- Oregon Department of Administrative Services
- Oregon Residents (through courthouse services)
Notable changes
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 3369 emphasize the need for local flexibility to address economic constraints and safety concerns when improving courthouse facilities. They argue that this provision will enable counties to make necessary upgrades while balancing budgetary constraints, thereby ensuring public safety, accessibility, and efficiency in the administration of justice. Proponents also highlight the importance of addressing courthouse expansion needs, which they believe is crucial for maintaining efficient operations and serving the community effectively. By providing local flexibility, HB 3369 aims to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and necessary infrastructure investments.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours