HB 3478
Eliminates gallonage requirements for eligibility for nonretail cardlock dispensing of motor vehicle fuel.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill changes how nonretail cardlock facilities dispense motor vehicle fuel in Oregon. It eliminates the requirement for cardlock users to purchase a certain amount of fuel annually, and increases the licensing period for these facilities from one year to three years. The bill also allows certain non-customer users, such as employees of government agencies or nonprofits, to dispense fuel under specific conditions and with safety training.
Key provisions
- Eliminates gallonage requirements for nonretail cardlock dispensing.
- Increases cardlock facility licensing period to three years.
- Allows nonretail customers (excluding owners/operators) to dispense fuel under specific conditions.
- Specifies acceptable documentation for nonretail customers (e.g., tax deductions, government purchases).
- Requires safety training for nonretail customers.
- Creates a conditional use license option for nonretail facilities.
- Updates ORS 480.341 and 480.350 to reflect changes.
- Sets a fee for nonretail customers to be paid to the State Fire Marshal.
Who is affected
- Motor vehicle fuel retailers
- Cardlock facility owners and operators
- Nonretail customers of fuel stations
- Government agencies
- Nonprofit organizations
Notable changes
- Removes the annual gallonage requirement for cardlock users.
- Extends cardlock facility licensing to three years.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Testifiers overwhelmingly support the bill, citing its potential to benefit both Oregonians and businesses. They argue that the legislation's provisions will drive economic growth, create jobs, and improve quality of life for residents. Proponents emphasize the need for this type of initiative, highlighting the state's unique challenges and opportunities. By consolidating support around key benefits, such as job creation and community development, supporters aim to demonstrate a strong case for the bill's passage.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours