HB 3512
Prohibits the distribution or sale of certain covered products that contain intentionally added perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2025 Regular Session
Committee
Climate, Energy, and Environment
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
87%
Oppose
13%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill prohibits the sale and distribution of certain products containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It specifically targets items like artificial turf, cookware, cosmetics, and textiles. Manufacturers of these products will need to provide certificates of compliance to ensure they don’t contain these chemicals, and the Attorney General has the authority to investigate violations and impose penalties. The law takes effect on January 1, 2027.
Key provisions
- Prohibits the sale and distribution of covered products containing PFAS.
- Requires manufacturers to provide certificates of compliance.
- Authorizes the Attorney General to investigate and impose civil penalties for violations.
- Defines specific ‘covered products’ including artificial turf, cookware, cosmetics, and textiles.
- Establishes a rebuttable presumption that the presence of total fluorine indicates PFAS contamination.
- Sets a penalty of up to $5,000 for a first violation and $10,000 for subsequent violations.
- The law takes effect on January 1, 2027.
Who is affected
- Manufacturers of covered products
- Retailers and distributors of covered products
- Consumers purchasing covered products
- The Attorney General's office
Notable changes
- Adds a detailed list of ‘covered products’ including items like cookware, cosmetics, and textiles.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of the measure emphasize the need for swift action to mitigate the effects of climate change, with many testifiers citing scientific evidence linking PFAS exposure to serious health risks, including cancer and impaired immune function. The importance of protecting Oregonians' health and reducing carbon emissions is a common thread among supporters, who advocate for banning forever chemicals due to their environmental impact and health concerns. Testifiers share personal stories of how PFAS contamination has affected their lives, highlighting the devastating impact of these chemicals on human health and the environment. With many citing peer-reviewed studies and national best practices as justification, supporters urge the committee to support HB 3512, which aims to phase out toxic PFAS chemicals in Oregon to protect public health and prevent further pollution.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 3512 express concerns about the bill's potential impact on industries and consumers. Many that the proposed ban on certain PFAS chemicals would be overly broad, lead to unintended consequences, and create significant compliance challenges for manufacturers and retailers. The industry is concerned about product safety and availability due to unclear product scope, while others worry about the economic burden of prohibiting the sale of products containing PFAS, citing substantial job losses and lost sales revenue. Additionally, some testifiers question the clarity and consistency of the bill's definitions, particularly with regards to 'intentionally added' PFAS chemicals, which they believe would lead to confusion and inconsistency in compliance.