HB 3626
Defines "powered micromobility device" for the vehicle code.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
96%
Oppose
4%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill defines the term "powered micromobility device" for use in the Oregon Vehicle Code. It establishes standards for these devices, including maximum speed and weight limits, and clarifies their classification relative to motor vehicles. The bill also addresses safety requirements for minors, particularly regarding protective headgear, and outlines regulations for local governments to manage the operation of these devices.
Key provisions
- Defines "powered micromobility device" with specific criteria (speed, weight, propulsion system).
- Establishes minimum age requirements for operating certain powered micromobility devices (e.g., e-scooters, electric assisted bicycles).
- Requires minors under 16 to wear protective headgear when operating bicycles, electric assisted bicycles, motor assisted scooters, and powered micromobility devices.
- Specifies that powered micromobility devices are not motor vehicles for vehicle code purposes, except in specific cases.
- Directs the Department of Transportation to conduct a public awareness campaign regarding new laws.
- Outlines exemptions from registration requirements for certain vehicles (e.g., road rollers, farm tractors).
- Grants temporary driving privileges to individuals not residents of Oregon or with limited residency.
- Establishes a fine for operating a powered micromobility device without protective headgear.
Who is affected
- Pedestrians
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Emerson Levy
Cosponsor
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of House Bill 3626 advocate for establishing clear rules and regulations to promote safe sharing of the road among all users, including e-bike riders. They emphasize the importance of increasing safety measures for micromobility options, citing challenges with the misuse of scooters and motorcycles posing as bicycles. Many personal benefits from using e-bikes, highlighting their role in reducing car usage, promoting environmental protection, public health, and accessibility. They also support the bill's aim to address growing demand for sustainable transportation alternatives, including low-carbon transportation options crucial for combating climate change and creating a more equitable future. By establishing uniform safety standards, supporters believe Oregon can make its multimodal transportation system safe, accessible, and inclusive for all road users.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Many concerns that the bill's current definition of a class 3 e-bike does not adequately address public safety risks. They argue that e-bikes capable of exceeding 30 MPH pose significant hazards to pedestrians and other cyclists, particularly on shared paths and trails. Some that e-bikes should be classified as motorized vehicles with licensing requirements or taxes/registration fees to ensure they are used responsibly and safely. Additionally, there is concern that the lack of regulation could lead to increased accidents and injuries, highlighting the need for stricter oversight and safety measures.