HB 3630
Modifies exemption from the taxable estate for the value of natural resource property to accommodate interests owned through a trust or business entity.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
86%
Oppose
14%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill modifies Oregon’s estate tax laws to allow estates to avoid paying tax on natural resource property (such as farmland, forests, or fishing interests) if the property is held through a trust or business entity. It introduces specific rules regarding how these interests are valued, including requirements for family participation and replacement property. The changes apply to estates of decedents dying on or after July 1, 2025, and take effect 91 days after the legislative session concludes.
Key provisions
- Defines ‘Eligible Business Entity’ and ‘Eligible Trust’ based on family ownership.
- Allows for valuation of natural resource property held through trusts and business entities.
- Requires a minimum period of family participation (at least 75% of relevant business days) to qualify for the exemption.
- Permits replacement property to maintain the exemption, with specific rules for involuntary conversions.
- Imposes an additional tax if the exempt property is later sold to a non-family member or if the required family participation is not met.
- Establishes a maximum exemption amount of $15 million.
- Modifies the calculation of the Oregon taxable estate to account for property located outside of Oregon.
- Specifies that estate taxes paid from funds of an estate or trust are not considered a further taxable benefit.
Who is affected
- Estate owners
- Trustees
- Farmers
- Forestry businesses
- Fishing businesses
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 3630 generally agree that the bill provides necessary updates to Oregon's tax exemptions for family-owned businesses related to natural resources. They cite ambiguities in existing laws, such as ORS 118.145, which affect common forms of ownership and business structures used by families who would benefit from the exemption. Proponents argue that the legislation clarifies issues like taxable transfers and provides flexibility in exchanging qualified properties, ultimately offering relief for farmers, ranchers, foresters, and fishers who pass down their operations to the next generation. By addressing concerns about the Natural Resource Exclusion's application and providing clarity on estate tax law, supporters believe HB 3630 will improve outcomes for surviving family members regarding death and estate taxes.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 3630 argue that reducing the estate tax would undermine efforts to address economic inequality and compromise the state's commitment to supporting vulnerable populations. They contend that the tax is a crucial source of revenue for low-income families, as it helps maintain access to essential services and resources. By eliminating or reducing the tax, opponents claim that the general fund will be depleted, ultimately harming the very individuals the estate tax was intended to protect. Furthermore, they argue that this policy change would disproportionately benefit high-net-worth individuals, exacerbating existing wealth disparities in Oregon.