HB 3681
Requires the Energy Facility Siting Council to conclude a contested case and issue a final order within 12 months from the date of a proposed order.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
79%
Oppose
21%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill aims to speed up the process for approving energy facilities in Oregon by requiring the Energy Facility Siting Council to conclude contested cases and issue final orders within 12 months of a proposed order. It also allows for minor changes to site certificates, extends construction deadlines, and clarifies how the Public Utility Commission reviews applications for overhead transmission lines. Additionally, the bill modifies rules regarding condemnation proceedings and allows for certain uses on marginal lands within exclusive farm use zones.
Key provisions
- Requires the Energy Facility Siting Council to conclude contested cases and issue final orders within 12 months of a proposed order.
- Allows for minor changes to site certificates without requiring an amendment.
- Extends deadlines for construction of energy facilities by up to three years.
- Narrows the criteria by which the Public Utility Commission reviews applications for overhead transmission lines.
- Clarifies the use of site certificates for high voltage transmission lines.
- Establishes a process for expedited review of certain energy facility applications.
- Modifies rules regarding judicial review of council decisions.
- Allows for certain uses on marginal lands within exclusive farm use zones, including residences and some commercial activities.
Who is affected
- Energy Facility Siting Council
- Developers of energy facilities
- Local governments
- Residents of Oregon
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of House Bill 3681 emphasize the urgent need to update and streamline Oregon's energy transmission regulations to facilitate the development of clean energy projects, address climate change, and ensure reliable electricity supply. They argue that outdated rules and complex permitting processes hinder the transition to renewable energy sources, causing delays and increasing costs. Advocates for the bill highlight its potential to improve energy reliability, reduce waste caused by regulatory barriers, and promote economic development benefits from clean energy infrastructure. Many testifiers also emphasize the importance of expediting permitting processes, removing regulatory clutter, and enabling timely action on policies to address growing energy demands and accelerate Oregon's transition to a low-carbon economy.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of the bill express concerns that it would limit access to due process and timeframes for non-contested cases, potentially hindering rural communities and small businesses. They also argue that the proposed changes would undermine transparency, public engagement, and environmental protections in the review process of new renewable energy projects, prioritizing industrial solar facilities over existing land protections and Oregon's energy sustainability. Furthermore, critics contend that the bill would remove public input opportunities, create confusion with multiple processes for amended site certificates, and potentially lead to disasters, financial losses, and harm to rural Oregon communities, including the conversion of Exclusive Farm Use lands to industrial solar facilities without adequate consideration for property rights and farm operations.