HB 3687
Prohibits a supermajority vote requirement for any question related to a county or city charter.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
20%
Oppose
80%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill changes how local charters are amended. Currently, many changes to a county or city charter require a supermajority vote. This bill would lower that requirement to a simple majority vote, allowing charter changes to be approved by a majority of voters.
Key provisions
- Changes to county charters must be approved by a simple majority vote.
- Changes to city charters must be approved by a simple majority vote.
- The bill amends ORS 203.720 to specify the simple majority vote requirement for county charter elections.
- The bill amends ORS 221.210 to specify the simple majority vote requirement for city charter elections.
- The county charter and related legislation will take precedence over conflicting state statutes.
- The bill takes effect 91 days after the end of the 2025 legislative session.
Who is affected
- Counties
- Cities
- County charter voters
- City charter voters
- Local governments
Notable changes
- Replaces the current supermajority vote requirement for charter amendments with a simple majority vote.
- Clarifies that county and city charters supersede conflicting state statutes.
- Establishes a specific effective date for the changes.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
The supporters of House Bill 3687 argue that this legislation is crucial to safeguarding Oregon's direct democracy, allowing citizens to have a greater say in local governance. By establishing a simple majority as the threshold for amending city or county charters, the bill aims to increase transparency and community engagement in the amendment process. Proponents contend that this change will empower citizens to participate more effectively in shaping their local governments, promoting accountability and responsiveness to the needs of residents.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of the proposed charter change express concerns about the state's role in local governance. They argue that imposing a uniform requirement on localities would undermine their autonomy and ability to tailor regulations to their unique needs. Many believe that the state is over-reaching into local affairs, which could lead to mismanagement and corruption. Some also worry that the bill's provisions could be exploited for personal gain or special interests, potentially harming taxpayers and eroding trust in government.
Source: Testimony Summaries