HB 3825
Provides that judgment remedies for judgments of conviction in municipal and justice courts for the possession of less than one ounce of marijuana expire on the effective date of the Act.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
50%
Oppose
50%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill changes the rules for expunging marijuana convictions in Oregon municipal and justice courts. Specifically, it sets a date for when judgment remedies related to possession of less than one ounce of marijuana will expire, coinciding with the effective date of the law. Expired remedies will be considered fulfilled for expungement purposes. The bill also clarifies that if monetary obligations associated with the conviction have expired, a person is considered to have fully complied with the sentence for those obligations.
Key provisions
- Judgment remedies for marijuana possession convictions (less than one ounce) in municipal and justice courts will expire on the effective date of the Act.
- The expiration of these remedies will be considered fulfillment of the sentence for expungement purposes.
- If monetary obligations associated with the conviction have expired, a person is considered to have fully complied with the sentence.
- The bill takes effect 91 days after the end of the 2025 legislative session.
Who is affected
- Individuals convicted of marijuana possession (less than one ounce)
- Municipal courts
- Justice courts
- Oregon residents
Notable changes
- Expungement timelines for marijuana convictions are being adjusted.
- The bill clarifies the relationship between expired judgment remedies and expungement eligibility.
- It specifically addresses monetary obligations associated with the conviction.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 3825 and HB 4097 with the Dash 6 Amendments agree that shortening the period for fines and fees on criminal judgments would ease financial strain on individuals with conviction histories, enabling them to expunge records, secure employment, and access stable housing. that these fees cause persistent financial insecurity and physical/mental health issues, particularly among low-income individuals and justice-involved individuals who struggle to overcome the cycle of poverty. By removing financial barriers to expungement for eligible defendants while adding safety protections for survivors of domestic and sexual violence, proponents aim to provide a balanced approach to justice reform that promotes rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB3825 express concerns that the legislation would have unintended consequences, including undermining victims' rights and creating financial burdens on individuals who have been victimized. that shortening the collection time for compensatory fines would limit one of the few financial remedies available to crime victims in Oregon, contradicting the legislature's historical priority on compensatory fines. Additionally, opponents believe the bill could create unintended consequences, such as hindering rehabilitation by shortening the expiration period of monetary obligations and potentially backfiring on victims who are unable to pay back to society.