HB 3948
Increases the penalty for operating an unmanned aircraft system over a critical infrastructure facility that is a correctional facility or youth correction facility.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill increases the penalties for operating drones over critical infrastructure facilities, specifically correctional facilities and youth correction facilities. Individuals caught operating a drone within 400 feet of these facilities, or allowing it to make contact, could face a Class A violation or, if the violation involves these specific facilities, a Class C felony. The court can also order the drone to be forfeited upon conviction.
Key provisions
- Increases penalties for drone operation over correctional and youth correction facilities.
- A Class A violation for operating a drone within 400 feet of these facilities.
- A Class C felony for operating a drone within 400 feet of these facilities and making contact.
- The court can order the drone to be forfeited upon conviction.
- Exemptions for federal government, public bodies, law enforcement agencies, and those acting on their behalf.
- Exemptions for property owners and those with prior written consent.
- Exemptions for commercial drone operations compliant with FAA regulations.
Who is affected
- Drone operators
- Correctional facilities
- Youth correction facilities
- Individuals working at correctional facilities
- Federal Aviation Administration
Notable changes
- Increases the potential penalties for drone violations at correctional and youth correction facilities.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of House Bill 3948 emphasize the need for enhanced security measures to prevent the introduction of contraband into correctional facilities, citing the potential risks posed by drones. They argue that this legislation would promote a safer environment for youth reformation and rehabilitation, aligning with the Oregon Youth Authority's mission to provide a secure and supportive setting for young people. By prohibiting the use of drones to introduce contraband, proponents believe they can reduce the risk of harm to both staff and inmates, ultimately contributing to a more effective and humane correctional system.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours