HB 3963
Extends to January 1, 2027, the date by which the Department of Land Conservation and Development is to report on the department's assessment of the state enforceable policies that may be used in the federal consistency review of offshore wind leasing decisions and related actions.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
89%
Oppose
11%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill extends the deadline for the Department of Land Conservation and Development to complete a report assessing state policies relevant to the federal consistency review of offshore wind leasing decisions. The report is now due by January 1, 2027, instead of the original September 1, 2025, deadline. The report will summarize the department’s work and may include recommendations for legislation and policy related to marine renewable energy and coastal resources.
Key provisions
- Extends the report deadline to January 1, 2027.
- Requires the Department of Land Conservation and Development to assess state policies.
- The report must summarize the department’s activities related to offshore wind development.
- The report may include recommendations for legislation and policy.
- The report’s submission follows established procedures outlined in ORS 192.245.
- The bill amends sections 5 and 6 of Chapter 31, Oregon Laws 2024.
Who is affected
- Department of Land Conservation and Development
- Legislative Assembly committees
- Offshore wind energy developers
- Coastal resource managers
- Oregon residents
Notable changes
- Extends the original reporting deadline by over two years.
- Specifies the scope of the report to include recommendations for legislation and policy.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
James Manning Jr.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of extending Oregon's offshore wind energy roadmap process generally agree that a longer timeline would allow for comprehensive research, community engagement, and stakeholder input. They emphasize the importance of ensuring that clean energy goals are met while protecting marine ecosystems and coastal communities. Many testifiers also highlight the need to improve the development process and engage diverse stakeholders, with some specifically advocating for union jobs and local workforce development. By extending the timeline, proponents argue that Oregon can increase clean energy production, create economic opportunities, and advance climate resiliency goals, ultimately benefiting coastal communities and promoting a sustainable future.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 3963 express concerns that increasing renewable energy production through wind and solar farms will have significant environmental implications. They argue that the costs associated with these energy sources, such as land acquisition and maintenance, are often borne by taxpayers or local communities, while the benefits may not be evenly distributed. Additionally, some that the visual impact of large-scale wind and solar installations can be detrimental to rural landscapes and property values, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of this approach to energy production.