HB 3991
Directs the Division of Audits to conduct performance audits of the Department of Transportation.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
6%
Oppose
94%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill directs the Oregon Division of Audits to conduct performance audits of the Department of Transportation (ODOT). It aims to improve the responsible use of state funds and ensure efficient capital projects. The bill also makes changes to the Oregon Transportation Commission’s duties, establishes a mandatory per-mile road usage charge for electric and hybrid vehicles, allows for an annual fee as an alternative, repeals the mandatory toll program, and adjusts diesel fuel taxation. Finally, it revises weight-mile taxes and establishes a process for highway cost allocation studies.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Joint Special Session Committee On Transportation Funding
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of the legislation emphasize the need for stable and increased transit funding for rural communities, highlighting the critical importance of predictable resources to sustain operations and ensure reliable service. They also advocate for an audit of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to ensure transparency and accountability in transportation funding, with a focus on protecting taxpayer dollars and preventing potential mismanagement or corruption. Additionally, many support increasing public transit funding increases to prevent further service cuts and alleviate concerns for rural residents, while others argue that funding for road maintenance requires a financial investment, such as increased gas taxes or fees. Overall, supporters believe the legislation is crucial for addressing Oregon's transportation funding crisis, ensuring reliable commuting, access to goods, and faster response during natural disasters, and strengthening ODOT through performance audits and increased transparency and accountability in transportation fund management.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 3991 express concerns about the regressive nature of new taxes on Oregonians, citing the state's high cost of living as a significant burden. Many that increasing taxes will drive businesses away from Oregon, reducing the state's tax base and revenue, while also forcing price increases and reducing their ability to keep staff employed. Several individuals share personal stories of struggling financially due to increasing costs, highlighting the difficulty of making ends meet with proposed taxes that would affect ODOT employees. the importance of living within one's means, prioritizing existing funds, and avoiding new taxes, suggesting that taxpayers should not be burdened with additional financial obligations. Many also express concerns about accountability for tax dollars, poor management in Oregon, and the potential negative impact on individuals with limited incomes. Overall, opponents argue that HB 3991 is unaffordable, increases costs without addressing root issues, and goes against the people's wishes.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.