SB 5509
Limits biennial expenditures from fees, moneys or other revenues, including Miscellaneous Receipts, but excluding lottery funds and federal funds, collected or received by the Construction Contractors Board.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2025 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of Oregon Department of Administrative Services)
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill restricts how the Construction Contractors Board can spend money collected from fees, miscellaneous revenues, and other sources during the biennial budget cycle. Specifically, it limits these expenditures to $23,370,802, excluding lottery funds and federal grants. The bill aims to control the board’s budget by limiting its use of non-federal revenue streams. It also includes a minor amendment to adjust a specific dollar amount within the bill.
Key provisions
- Limits biennial expenditures from fees, moneys, and miscellaneous receipts.
- Excludes lottery funds and federal funds from the spending restrictions.
- Applies to the Construction Contractors Board.
- Specifies a revised expenditure limit of $23,370,802.
Who is affected
- Construction Contractors Board
- Oregon taxpayers
- Individuals and businesses subject to Construction Contractors Board fees
Notable changes
- Adjusts a specific dollar amount within the bill's text.
Fiscal impact
The bill may impact the Construction Contractors Board's budget allocation by limiting its use of non-federal revenue.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Oregon Department of Administrative Services
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
The supporters of the Construction Contractors Board's 2025-2027 budget, including a fee increase, emphasize the importance of maintaining strong consumer protections and ensuring a level playing field in the industry. They argue that this investment will enable the agency to enhance customer service and promote fairness for businesses. By supporting the proposed fees, advocates believe they can help ensure that consumers receive quality services while also promoting competition and innovation in the industry.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours