HB 4076
Requires the Energy Facility Siting Council to find that reasons justify why the state policy in applicable statewide planning goals should not apply to a proposed energy facility if the council finds that the proposed energy facility will deliver electricity to the electric grid using an existing energy facility's surplus interconnection and does not require associated transmission lines more than two miles from the existing energy facility.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
62%
Oppose
38%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill changes how the Energy Facility Siting Council (EFSC) can approve renewable energy projects. It allows the EFSC to overlook certain state planning goals if a new facility connects to an existing one’s surplus power capacity and doesn’t require new transmission lines longer than two miles. The bill also clarifies definitions related to renewable energy facilities and outlines specific requirements for applications, including habitat assessments and decommissioning plans. It establishes a process for local governments to justify exceptions to land use goals for renewable energy projects.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
James Manning Jr.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 4076 generally agree that the bill offers a crucial pathway to alleviate bottlenecks in getting energy projects permitted, built, and operational. They propose amendments aimed at streamlining permitting processes, making it easier to upgrade and re-energize existing energy facilities without triggering costly grid upgrades, and increasing renewable energy capacity through co-location of generation sites. By facilitating the development of surplus interconnection-based renewable energy projects, supporters believe this bill will accelerate the transition to clean energy, meet state goals, and benefit ratepayers by reducing costs and improving reliability.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4076-1 express concerns about the bill's technical complexity and potential unintended consequences. Some argue that the study is unnecessary and will be used to promote a particular ideology, while others believe it may be used as a vehicle for gutting other bills, casting doubt on its purpose. Additionally, testifiers raise concerns about the safety of adding solar power to existing wind farms without proper oversight, citing fire danger and site-specific issues. Furthermore, some advocate for shifting focus towards alternative energy sources, such as natural gas cogeneration and fusion research, suggesting that windmills and solar farms are no longer viable options.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.