SB 5702
Establishes and modifies limits on payment of expenses from specified funds by certain state agencies for capital construction.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of Joint Committee on Ways and Means for Senator Kate Lieber)
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
99%
Oppose
1%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill modifies spending limits for state agencies on capital construction projects. It establishes and adjusts maximum spending amounts for various projects across multiple departments, including the Department of Administrative Services, Housing and Community Services, the Oregon Military Department, and the Department of Corrections. The bill also extends the expiration dates of certain capital construction project approvals and expenditure limitations, and allocates funds for specific projects like building renovations, facility upgrades, and infrastructure improvements. An emergency declaration allows the bill to take effect immediately upon passage.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Joint Committee On Ways and Means
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters urge the allocation of $100 million in General Obligation Bonds for affordable housing preservation through Senate Bill 5702, with a focus on preventing the loss of existing affordable homes and sustaining the collective response to Oregon's housing crisis. Advocates emphasize the need for permanent, affordable housing options, citing programs like LIFT Homeownership as key factors in building household stability, generational wealth, and strong communities. Many testifiers highlight the urgent need for preservation funding due to expiring affordability restrictions, unfunded repair needs, and the sale or closure of affordable manufactured housing parks. They also express support for innovative approaches, such as using Q bonds for a new housing preservation program, and emphasize the importance of preserving regulated affordable homes and providing certainty to property owners and residents.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Several ed opposition to the proposed funding for housing projects in SB 5702, citing fiscal concerns and worries about the state's financial sustainability. They argue that allocating additional funds for housing initiatives would further strain the state's budget, potentially leading to increased taxes or reduced spending on other essential services. Additionally, some testifiers questioned the effectiveness of the proposed funding model, suggesting that it may not be an efficient use of resources. Overall, opponents emphasize the need for careful consideration of the financial implications and potential unintended consequences of investing in housing projects.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.