SB 1525
Establishes the Blue Economy Task Force.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of Senate Interim Committee on Energy and Environment)
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
94%
Oppose
6%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
Senate Bill 1525 creates a Blue Economy Task Force to study the economic and environmental opportunities within Oregon’s ocean-related industries. The task force will be composed of representatives from various sectors, including research, business, fishing, tourism, environmental groups, and tribal communities. It is tasked with producing a report by September 15, 2027, and may recommend legislative changes. This bill also authorizes the Oregon Ocean Science Trust to establish a nonprofit organization to support the task force’s work.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Senate Interim Committee on Energy and Environment
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of Senate Bill 1525 advocate for the establishment of a Blue Economy Task Force to study Oregon's ocean-based economic development and create a strategic roadmap for sustainable growth. The task force would support initiatives like ORKA's kelp forest stewardship program, promote sustainable fishing practices, and reduce reliance on imported seafood. Proponents argue that this bill provides a stable foundation for coastal communities, aligns economic development with environmental stewardship, and empowers them to contribute to statewide economic prosperity. By bringing together coastal voices in a coordinated way, the task force would help maintain strong coastal economies, resilient working waterfronts, and support innovation in Oregon's coastal communities.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Several ed opposition to SB 1525, citing concerns that the bill's implementation could be marred by corrupt influences and inadequate funding. They argued that these issues would lead to a costly and burdensome process, potentially undermining the bill's intended goals. Additionally, some d that the proposed legislation may not effectively address the underlying problems it aims to solve, instead creating new challenges for stakeholders. These concerns highlight the need for careful consideration of the bill's potential consequences and the measures necessary to mitigate any negative impacts.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.