SB 1531
Requires the Oregon Health Authority to study the feasibility of funding emergency medical services through a universal health care model.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of Senate Interim Committee on Veterans, Emergency Management, Federal and World Affairs)
Committee
Health Care
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill directs the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) to conduct a study examining how emergency medical services (EMS) could be funded using a universal healthcare model. The study will explore options like combining public and private resources, state oversight, and local control. OHA is required to submit its findings and recommendations to the Legislative Assembly’s interim committees by September 15, 2027, with the study concluding by January 2, 2028.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Emergency Management, Federal and World Affairs Senate Interim Committee on Veterans
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Several that rural Oregonians face significant challenges in accessing timely and affordable emergency medical services, with many citing the current market-based model as inadequate. They argue that a state-funded model with delegated local control, as proposed by SB 1531, could better address these disparities and ensure more equitable access to emergency care. Additionally, testifiers highlight the urgent need for action to mitigate the growing costs of uncovered emergency care, which they believe poses an imminent crisis for individuals and families struggling to afford essential medical services. By prioritizing state funding and local control, supporters aim to create a more sustainable and responsive system that meets the unique needs of rural communities.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.