HB 4081
Makes changes to the highway worker photo radar laws.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
67%
Oppose
33%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill makes changes to Oregon’s laws regarding photo radar used in highway work zones. It clarifies that photo radar units can only be operated when highway workers are present or when the roadway configuration has temporarily changed. The Department of Transportation is responsible for implementing a program, ensuring proper equipment maintenance, and posting signs indicating photo radar is in use. The bill also outlines procedures for issuing citations and allows for a certificate of innocence to challenge a speeding ticket issued via photo radar.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsor
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 4081 and related legislation emphasize the need to reduce preventable crashes and create safer roadways in highway construction zones. They cite alarming trends, including a steady increase in fatalities and injuries since the COVID-19 pandemic, as evidence that more measures are necessary to shift driver behavior and reduce speeds in work zones. Advocates highlight the importance of improved public awareness, enforcement tools such as speed cameras and automated photo radar, and stricter posted speed limits to protect both workers and drivers. By implementing these measures, supporters believe that lives can be saved and injuries reduced, ultimately making conditions safer for all road users.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4081 express concerns that the legislation's expansion of automated photo radar speed enforcement in highway work zones will disproportionately affect low-income and working-class Oregonians, potentially leading to cascading financial consequences. They also argue that requiring a facial picture for speed cameras introduces unnecessary privacy concerns and creates operational and financial challenges, which could be mitigated by aligning with national best practices. Additionally, some the legislation's requirements pose significant risks to individuals' privacy and create potential vulnerabilities in data protection, particularly for communities of color and those experiencing poverty who may already face disproportionate burdens.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.