SB 1599
Moves the election date for the parts of chapter 1, Oregon Laws 2025 (special session), referred to the people by Referendum Petition 2026-302, to the primary election held on May 19, 2026.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
1%
Oppose
99%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill changes the date for a special election related to a transportation ballot measure that was put to voters through a referendum. It moves the election to coincide with the primary election on May 19, 2026. The amendment also clarifies procedures for ballot titles and ensures compliance with relevant Oregon laws regarding Supreme Court review and voter information.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters argue that implementing the transportation bill as soon as possible is crucial due to critical needs on hand, citing the potential negative consequences of a six-month delay in road work. They believe that a May election would allow for more timely expression of outrage from opponents and result in a higher turnout than a November election, potentially boosting voter participation by tying the bill to other causes and candidates. Additionally, supporters emphasize the importance of providing an opportunity for voters to have a say in how their community is governed, particularly when it comes to tax increases, and argue that delaying the implementation could harm those opposed to the bill. By moving forward with the legislation, supporters believe that Oregon can address its critical transportation infrastructure needs and strengthen its democratic process.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of SB1599 express strong opposition to the proposed legislation, citing concerns about taxation and regulation. Many believe that changing the election date from November to May undermines the democratic process and disregards the will of the people, who had initially agreed on the November ballot. that this move would increase voter turnout if decided on the November ballot, but many also express dissatisfaction with the current governor's decision to shift the 'No Tax Referendum' from the November 2026 ballot to a low-turnout May primary. Concerns about partisan manipulation and erosion of democratic trust are also raised, as well as fears that the legislation may have an unfair impact on rural areas and small businesses. Ultimately, opponents urge lawmakers to respect the voice of democracy and maintain the original agreement, with many advocating for removing SB 1599 from the May ballot and placing it on the November ballot instead.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.