SCR 205
Adjourns sine die the 2026 regular session of the Eighty-third Legislative Assembly.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
25%
Oppose
75%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This resolution formally ends the 2026 regular session of the Eighty-third Oregon Legislative Assembly. It declares that the Senate and House of Representatives have concluded their work for the session. The resolution simply signifies the adjournment sine die, which means ‘without day,’ indicating the session is officially over. It’s a procedural measure to close out the legislative session.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of SCR 205 emphasize the pressing need for affordable housing solutions, highlighting the growing number of low-income residents struggling to find stable and secure rentals. They argue that government-subsidized housing projects and rental housing initiatives are essential in addressing this issue, citing evidence of rising housing costs and homelessness rates. Proponents also contend that such initiatives would promote economic mobility, reduce poverty, and support vulnerable populations, particularly families with children and individuals with disabilities. By investing in affordable housing, supporters believe that the state can help mitigate the effects of income inequality and ensure a more equitable distribution of resources.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4145 express significant concerns regarding the amendment's poorly written provisions, which they argue raise substantial implementation and legal questions that may not be in Oregon's best interest. They also strongly object to the measure, citing its potential to create a two-tier system of citizenship and undermine protection for average citizens, while acknowledging the necessity of certain self-defense tools. Furthermore, some opponents worry about the amendment's impact on the legislative process and the committee's workload, suggesting that it may have unintended consequences that could affect the overall effectiveness of the law.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.