SB 1518
Clarifies the meaning of "companionship services" for purposes of minimum wage and overtime requirements for certain individuals performing such services.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of Senate Interim Committee on Labor and Business)
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill clarifies the definition of "companionship services" for wage and overtime purposes under Oregon law. It specifically exempts certain individuals from minimum wage and overtime requirements, including agricultural laborers, domestic workers on a casual basis, administrative and professional employees, and those employed by the U.S. government or in specific educational or charitable roles. The bill also directs the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) to study worker protections related to these services and submit a report by September 15, 2027.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Senate Interim Committee on Labor and Business
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of Senate Bill 1518 emphasize the need to protect millions of domestic service employees, including home health care workers, from potential federal rule changes that would strip them of minimum wage and overtime protections. Advocates argue that this legislation is crucial for maintaining wage and overtime standards, ensuring adequate staffing to provide in-home care for vulnerable populations such as older Oregonians. By decoupling Oregon's labor protections from the federal FLSA, supporters aim to safeguard home care workers' rights and prevent decades of progress under the Fair Labor Standards Act from being undone. This protection is particularly important given the historical exclusion of this workforce from basic labor protections due to racism and sexism, underscoring the need for targeted support to address these systemic inequalities.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.