SB 1551
Invalidates deed restrictions and planned community governing documents prohibiting the replacement of nonfire-hardened building materials or installation of fire-hardened building materials on residential properties.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill aims to allow homeowners in Oregon to replace building materials in their homes with fire-resistant materials, even if existing deed restrictions or planned community rules prohibit it. It specifically addresses limitations on upgrading building materials to improve fire safety, particularly in wildland-urban interface areas. The legislation seeks to remove restrictions that could make it difficult or expensive for homeowners to enhance their property’s resistance to wildfires. It clarifies that homeowners associations cannot unduly restrict the use of fire-resistant materials.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of Senate Bill 1551 believe the legislation is crucial in promoting wildfire preparedness by addressing the impact of home materials on fire spread. They advocate for home hardening as part of a statewide fire mitigation strategy, emphasizing its importance in improving communities' resilience to and ability to live with fires. Key supporters argue that this measure can help protect homeowners from wildfires, allow property owners to upgrade to fire-hardened building materials without restrictions, and reduce ignition and slow fire spread, giving firefighters more time to control fires. By removing barriers imposed by HOAs or deed terms, proponents aim to empower residents to take proactive measures to reduce wildfire risk and promote community wildfire preparedness.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.