SB 1553
Prohibits an electric company from recovering from retail electricity consumers certain litigation or settlement costs or expenses if a court or jury finds that a wildfire resulted from the negligence or a higher degree of fault on the part of the electric company.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
12%
Oppose
88%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill limits the ability of electric companies in Oregon to recover costs from customers related to wildfires if a court determines the company was negligent. Specifically, it prevents electric companies found liable for wildfires caused by their negligence from charging those affected by litigation or settlement expenses. The bill also establishes a fund to compensate wildfire victims and addresses potential tax liabilities related to such claims.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsor
James Manning Jr.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
that SB 1553 would provide crucial protections for Oregonians by holding negligent utilities accountable for the devastating impacts of wildfires. They point to the financial resources of companies like PacificCorp as sufficient to address litigation costs, and emphasize the need for greater accountability and support for those affected by these disasters. Additionally, frustration with the state's handling of wildfire victims, citing a lack of adequate support and an inequitable distribution of funds, which they argue is exacerbated by utility companies' undue influence on legislation.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
The opposition to Senate Bill 1553 expresses concerns that government involvement in the power industry would lead to inefficiencies, reduced competition, and higher costs for consumers. that private companies are better equipped to manage the power grid and provide services, and that increased government oversight could result in a lack of innovation and reduced investment in the power sector. Many also express concern about the potential negative economic impacts, including increased electricity costs, decreased business growth, and financial burdens on rural communities. Furthermore, opponents argue that SB 1553 would undermine the ability of power providers to make decisions about their own operations, potentially leading to a decrease in consumer choice and an increase in prices.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.