SB 1555
Directs the Joint Interim Committee on Ways and Means to use a cost model for the purpose of calculating the sum of moneys sufficient to meet the state's system of public education quality goals.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of Joint Interim Committee on Public Education Appropriation)
Committee
Education
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
23%
Oppose
77%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill directs the Joint Interim Committee on Ways and Means to use a cost model to calculate the amount of state funding needed to meet Oregon’s public education quality goals. It modifies these goals, specifically regarding teacher qualifications and district standards, and establishes a process for reporting on funding adequacy. Furthermore, the bill abolishes a joint committee related to public education appropriations and the Quality Education Commission, declaring an emergency effective upon passage.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Joint Interim Committee on Public Education Appropriation
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of Senate Bill 1555 with the -5 amendment generally agree that modernizing Oregon's Quality Education Model aligns with state accountability strategies and improvement goals, reflecting current educational realities. They argue that the bill provides credible information for policymakers by updating the process for estimating the cost of delivering a high-quality education in Oregon. Critics, including school district superintendents, highlight concerns about the outdated approach of the Quality Education Model, which they believe fails to account for unique needs such as poverty, disabilities, and language barriers. They also express support for any change that addresses these limitations and brings the model more in line with current educational realities. Overall, supporters see the bill as a necessary step towards improving Oregon's education system.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of Senate Bill 1555 express concerns that the legislation redefines 'quality goals' for public education as minimum requirements rather than aspirational standards. Many that this shift could undermine the focus on student needs and learning outcomes, with some citing insufficient school-based mental health support and a lack of transparency in determining funding. Others express skepticism about the bill's emphasis on standardized testing and metrics, which they believe would remove creativity from teaching and learning. Additionally, opponents emphasize the need for local decision-making, quality data, and fair compensation for teachers, warning that the proposed funding model risks misidentifying symptoms while ignoring underlying causes and may not provide sufficient support for Oregon's education system, particularly given severe budget shortfalls.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.