SB 1583
Establishes the Behavioral Health and Deflection Committee within the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
8%
Oppose
92%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill establishes the Behavioral Health and Deflection Committee within the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission. The committee will administer grant programs for Behavioral Health Resource Networks and deflection programs, aiming to address substance abuse in Oregon. It also transfers the duties of the Oversight and Accountability Council to this new committee and directs it to analyze the most effective ways to address substance abuse within the state, including assessing treatment program availability and identifying best practices. Finally, the bill sets a deadline for the committee to provide a report to the Legislative Assembly.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
David Brock Smith
James Manning Jr.
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of SB 1583 argue that the bill aims to provide support and programs for those struggling with substance addiction, promoting healing and recovery rather than punishment. They emphasize the importance of giving back to others as a means of growth and healing, citing personal stories of overcoming addiction and finding happiness through spirituality and community support. Many testifiers also highlight the positive impact of Measure 110 funding on their lives and the lives of those they work with, including its role in supporting homeless individuals and fostering collaboration among organizations in the recovery community. Additionally, supporters argue that the bill's focus on providing a continuum of care for individuals involved in deflection programs will strengthen early engagement, continuity, and accountability, ultimately protecting progress made in building treatment centers and providing resources for recovery.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of Senate Bill 1583 express concerns that transferring oversight to a criminal justice body would marginalize public health expertise and risk reframing substance use as an enforcement issue rather than a care-based approach. They argue that this shift would destabilize the systems of care built under Measure 110, disrupting treatment, recovery, harm reduction, and deflection services, and potentially harming marginalized communities. Testifiers also express concerns over funding supervision, peer support, and access to accurate materials for young people in recovery, citing a lack of funding for addiction, treatment, and behavioral health services as exacerbating existing issues. Many emphasize the importance of maintaining a health-based approach to recovery, strengthening existing programs, and investing in actual access to care rather than making major governance shifts.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.