SB 1585
Sets maximum matching fund requirements for state grants to small incorporated cities for certain capital construction and municipal infrastructure and improvements.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
94%
Oppose
6%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill modifies Oregon law to establish maximum matching fund requirements for state grants provided to small incorporated cities for certain capital construction and municipal infrastructure projects. It outlines specific matching fund percentages based on the city’s population, with tiered requirements ranging from 3% to 12% of project costs. The bill also includes provisions related to safety improvement projects near schools, prioritizing funding for those projects and allowing cities to use grant funds for all phases of a project, including engineering and planning. Furthermore, it adjusts grant requirements for various funding sources, including the Oregon Transportation Commission and the Water Supply Development Account.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
James Manning Jr.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
The supporters of Senate Bill 1585 and related legislation argue that reducing or eliminating the dollar match requirement for state grants would provide critical funding relief to small cities, enabling them to deliver real infrastructure projects and improve public services. They contend that the current matching fund requirements disproportionately affect smaller jurisdictions, forcing them to choose between core services and infrastructure improvements. Proponents believe that setting clear ceilings on required local match or providing more flexible grant match requirements would alleviate these challenges, allowing small cities to stretch limited resources further and apply for more grant opportunities. By reducing the financial burden of matching funds, supporters argue that Senate Bill 1585 would improve access to state grants for smaller municipalities, enabling them to invest in infrastructure projects that benefit residents, promote business development, and support future growth.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of the bill argue that providing lower matching requirements to small cities while excluding special districts creates an equity and fairness issue. Special districts, which rely on state grant programs for infrastructure challenges due to their limited ability to raise revenue and operate on low budgets, are concerned that this disparity would provide preferential treatment to small cities. This exclusion would exacerbate existing vulnerabilities in the financial capabilities of special districts, potentially hindering their ability to address critical needs such as sewage treatment. By excluding special districts from lower matching rates, opponents believe that the bill fails to adequately address concerns about equity and fairness, ultimately undermining the financial stability of these entities.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.