SB 1588
Requires each electric company to develop an inclusive utility investment program to provide financing for customers' energy efficiency upgrades or renewable energy projects.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
84%
Oppose
16%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill requires Oregon’s electric companies to create programs that help customers pay for energy efficiency upgrades and renewable energy projects. These programs would offer financing, allowing customers to install things like solar panels or heat pumps, and in return, the electric company would receive a small, site-specific charge on the customer’s utility bill. The Public Utility Commission will oversee these programs, setting standards for savings and potentially offering incentives to electric companies to encourage participation and maximize customer benefits.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of Senate Bill 1588 believe that the bill will unlock savings by providing funds for energy efficiency and strategic electrification, reducing peak loads and grid strain. They argue that this will help households save money on their heating and cooling needs, making energy-efficient units more affordable and accessible to low-income and environmental justice communities. The bill aims to expand access to homeowner energy efficiency upgrades, paying for them with energy savings, and promote the development of green technologies, addressing the urgent need for action on climate change and its impact on rural and coastal communities in Southern Oregon. By providing alternate financing options and streamlining the process, SB 1588 can help Oregonians afford energy-efficient and clean technologies, promoting a modernized, carbon-free electrical grid while reducing energy bills and exposure to pollutants.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of Senate Bill 1588 express concerns about the feasibility and administrative burden of implementing an on-bill financing program. They argue that alternative energy programs are causing increased costs and harming citizens, businesses, and the economy. Critics also contend that the bill's approach to financing energy efficiency and renewable energy projects is overly broad, shifting utilities' core function into managing financial programs with risk, potentially leaving non-participating customers to subsidize those who do participate. Furthermore, opponents worry about the potential risks and uncertainties associated with PGE becoming a financial institution, including administrative costs and financial risk for utility companies, which could disproportionately affect low-income customers.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.