SB 1590
Prohibits public bodies from assisting the federal government with privatization of certain federally owned lands.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
65%
Oppose
35%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
Senate Bill 1590 restricts how Oregon public agencies can work with the federal government regarding the sale or transfer of federally owned land. Specifically, it prohibits these agencies from assisting in the privatization of land designated as surplus federal buildings, land held in trust for Native American tribes, or land acquired for conservation or recreational purposes. The bill clarifies that public agencies can still protect property rights and fulfill legal obligations related to land titles. The effective date of the emergency declaration has been extended to the passage of the bill.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Emerson Levy
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Oregonians strongly support preserving their state's public lands, citing both environmental and economic benefits. They emphasize the importance of protecting wildlife habitats, clean water sources, and mitigating climate change, while also preventing a budget shortfall. Many testifiers share personal experiences with outdoor recreation on Oregon's National Forests, BLM lands, and Wilderness Areas, highlighting the need to preserve these areas for future generations. s that public lands in Oregon should remain accessible for hunting, fishing, and other outdoor activities, and that selling them to private interests would be detrimental to the state's natural resources. They urge lawmakers to defend these lands with every tool at their disposal, emphasizing the importance of protecting Oregon's public lands for present and future generations.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of the bill express concerns about its potential impact on Oregon's public lands, wildfire management, and rural communities. Many that the legislation would hinder cooperation between state and federal governments, limit Oregon's ability to participate in privatization efforts, and negatively affect the state's economy and public health. Some also criticize the lack of transparency and accountability in the appointment process for managing natural resources and express concerns about the potential environmental consequences of new measures. Additionally, the importance of stewardship and governance, highlighting that Oregon should focus on legislation that benefits its citizens rather than trying to thwart federal actions.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.