SB 1594
Requires the Department of Justice to consult with the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Advancement when the department develops, reviews or updates model policies intended to limit immigration enforcement at public facilities.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
68%
Oppose
32%
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
Senate Bill 1594 requires the Oregon Department of Justice to work with the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Advancement when creating, revising, or updating policies related to immigration enforcement within state and local facilities. This consultation aims to ensure that these policies align with broader immigration goals and considerations. The bill also mandates that state and local law enforcement agencies cooperate with federal immigration authorities in carrying out actions concerning individuals convicted of felony crimes in Oregon. An emergency clause declares the bill effective immediately upon passage.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
James Manning Jr.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of Senate Bill 1594 advocate for clear guidelines and procedures for public agencies interacting with federal officers from ICE or Border Patrol to ensure public safety. They emphasize the need for state policies and procedures to address potential interactions, citing concerns about public safety, frontline employee protection, and immigrant community well-being. The bill aims to provide a model policy that local governments can access and use, making sanctuary policies more effective and relevant. Supporters believe the legislation addresses pressing issues in Oregon, including the dramatic shift in federal action and its impact on state agencies, and advocates for uniform administrative policies to address the safety and privacy of immigrants in Oregon.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of SB1594 express concerns that the bill would expand state involvement in federal immigration law enforcement, potentially undermining federal authority and creating confusion in law enforcement. Many that Oregonians want accountability and affordability in immigration policies, but not at the expense of federal laws or without public input. Some also emphasize the need for states to adhere to federal laws, suggesting that SB1594 would create unnecessary state resources for enforcement of immigration laws and potentially lead to selective law enforcement, which they believe undermines the rule of law and benefits some individuals or groups at the expense of others. Furthermore, several testifiers propose alternative solutions, such as focusing on rural road maintenance instead of housing initiatives, or emphasizing the importance of states working with Congress to change federal immigration laws rather than taking matters into their own hands.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.