HB 4042
Expands the types of adverse licensing actions the Department of Human Services may take against child-caring agencies following certain findings.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of House Interim Committee on Judiciary for Representative Jason Kropf)
Committee
Human Services
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
20%
Oppose
80%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill expands the ways the Department of Human Services can take action against child-caring agencies. It allows the department to impose stricter licensing requirements, modify rules regarding restraint use, and create exceptions to placement limits. Specifically, it broadens the types of adverse licensing actions that can be taken, including those related to financial mismanagement, abuse reporting, and safety concerns. The bill also addresses out-of-state placements for Indian children and clarifies rules regarding congregate care residential settings.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
House Interim Committee on Judiciary
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of House Bill 4042 generally agree that the bill establishes a more coherent and accountable oversight structure, recognizing that protecting children is not solely an individual responsibility but rather a collective one. They advocate for improved state oversight structures to protect children in high-risk environments, citing the need for clear expectations across state oversight and accountability structures. Many support the engrossed version of HB 4042 as a limited step forward, acknowledging its potential to increase access to behavioral health care for children in Oregon while urging further analysis and planning to address potential unintended consequences and develop a comprehensive approach to system improvements.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of House Bill 4042 express strong concerns that the legislation would weaken safety standards, introduce loopholes, and put vulnerable populations, particularly young Oregonians with disabilities, at risk. They argue that the bill's provisions would allow for housing children with violent adults, potentially causing physical and psychological harm, and would expand unlicensed settings and placements in adult facilities, compromising accountability and increasing risk. Testifiers also express opposition to the bill's potential to reduce protections for children, limit access to mental health services, and shift decision-making power away from families and towards systems that are not equipped to understand a youth's trauma history and needs. Many share personal experiences of abuse and neglect in residential care, highlighting the dangers of weakened standards and minimal oversight for children in congregate care. Overall, opponents emphasize the need to prioritize family-based care, strengthen safeguards, and address the root causes of behavioral issues in foster children rather than treating symptoms.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.