HB 4046
Directs the State Department of Energy, subject to the availability of funding, to conduct a study on nuclear energy, including advanced nuclear reactors.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
27%
Oppose
73%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill directs the Oregon State Department of Energy to conduct a comprehensive study on nuclear energy, including advanced reactor technologies. The study will examine various aspects such as feasibility, safety, waste management, economic impacts, and potential regulatory changes needed to support nuclear energy development in Oregon. The study will also involve consultation with tribes, state agencies, and other stakeholders, and the findings will be submitted to the legislature by February 15, 2027. Funding for the study will be dependent on available resources.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
David Brock Smith
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of House Bill 4046 emphasize the need for a comprehensive review of nuclear energy's potential health and environmental risks in Oregon, enabling informed decision-making. They advocate for a balanced exploration of advanced nuclear technologies, including small modular reactors (SMRs), to meet the state's evolving energy needs while achieving decarbonization objectives. Proponents believe that a thorough study on nuclear energy generation will provide reliable, carbon-free baseload power and offer a cost-effective alternative to expensive renewable energy sources like solar and ocean turbines, ultimately supporting Oregon's transition to a clean and affordable energy supply.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4046 express concerns about the lack of a permanent solution for nuclear waste storage, citing the highly radioactive nature of nuclear reactors and the ongoing risks to human health and the environment. They argue that current methods for storing this waste are not foolproof and that the bill's focus on advancing nuclear energy development without considering these risks is not a responsible use of resources. Additionally, opponents emphasize the need for a well-rounded scientifically based appraisal of nuclear power's advantages and disadvantages, highlighting the lack of diversity in participant expertise and the potential for biased results due to private funding. They advocate for Oregon to focus on real solutions to the climate crisis, such as energy efficiency, renewables, and storage, rather than investing in nuclear fantasy, and express concern that communities may be sacrificed zones for adverse health outcomes and possible nuclear disasters.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.