HB 4058
Permits the Department of Human Services to make certain out of state placements of children in specified circumstances.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of House Interim Committee on Early Childhood and Human Services for Representative Annessa Hartman)
Committee
Rules
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
0%
Oppose
100%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill allows the Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS) to place certain children, specifically Indian children, in out-of-state placements under specific circumstances. These placements must align with placement preferences for Indian children and either be at a youth regional treatment center operated by the Indian Health Service or requested by the child’s tribe. The bill also removes the requirement for these placements to be licensed or contracted with DHS or be a qualified residential treatment facility. An emergency declaration means the bill goes into effect immediately upon passage.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
House Interim Committee on Early Childhood and Human Services
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Many concerns that the bill will have unintended consequences, including increased costs for local governments, which could undermine its effectiveness in addressing affordable housing issues. Some also argue that the bill may cause confusion and persecution of First Nations citizens by blurring the lines between federal ICWA and Oregon's ORICWA statute, potentially leading to mistreatment and further marginalization of these communities. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential impact on rural areas and small towns, where local governments may bear the brunt of increased costs. Overall, opponents highlight the need for careful consideration and nuanced policy-making to avoid exacerbating existing social and economic challenges.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.