HB 4067
Requires the Department of Education to study the adequacy of education in the public schools of this state.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of House Interim Committee on Education)
Committee
Education
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
14%
Oppose
86%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
House Bill 4067 directs the Oregon Department of Education (ODE) to conduct a comprehensive study on the quality and effectiveness of public education across the state. The study’s findings and any recommendations for legislative changes will be submitted to the Oregon Legislative Assembly’s education-related committees by September 15, 2027. This research aims to provide a thorough assessment of the state’s educational system and inform potential improvements. The bill includes a sunset provision, ending the study’s requirements on January 2, 2028.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
House Interim Committee on Education
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of restoring $6 million in Outdoor School funding for 2026 argue that the program provides valuable experiential learning opportunities, enhancing individual confidence and career pathways. They contend that these benefits are particularly significant for underrepresented groups, who may lack access to similar experiences through traditional educational settings. By rejecting further cuts, supporters believe that the program can continue to provide a unique and effective way to support student development and prepare them for success in an increasingly competitive job market.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4067 express concerns that the bill's focus on performance-based accountability and potential funding withholding may divert resources away from classrooms and exacerbate existing issues with inadequate science instruction. They argue that the bill's approach is overly punitive, threatening to withhold funding if outcomes are not met, which could lead to a negative impact on students. Additionally, some that the bill was intentionally drafted to avoid public scrutiny, while others advocate for a more performance-based approach to education, suggesting that the current system is ineffective and should be held accountable for its outcomes. Overall, opponents urge caution and a vote of no, citing concerns about the potential negative effects on students and the need for more targeted solutions to address educational shortcomings.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.