HB 4092
Prohibits a retailer from knowingly selling or offering for sale, and a retail platform operator from knowingly permitting a retailer to advertise or offer for sale, a child safety system that does not comply with federal standards or standards the Department of Transportation adopts by rule.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill prohibits retailers and retail platform operators from knowingly selling or advertising child safety systems that don’t meet federal or state safety standards. Retailers must clearly disclose whether a system complies with these standards, and retail platforms must ensure retailers do the same. The bill also establishes a private right of action for violations, allowing individuals to seek damages. It aims to protect children by ensuring they are properly restrained in motor vehicles.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 4092 agree that child safety systems should meet federal safety standards and provide clear information to caregivers, maintaining consumer trust and confidence in the marketplace. They also emphasize the need to address the growing threat of counterfeit car seats sold through online marketplaces, which pose a significant safety risk to Oregon's children. By prohibiting the sale of non-compliant products and requiring retailers to clearly disclose compliance information, proponents believe that HB 4092 will increase accountability for the sale of misleading car seats and make online marketplaces safer for consumers. This legislation aims to protect parents and society by ensuring safe and reliable child safety products are available, particularly in communities where current systems have failed to provide adequate protection.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.