HB 4096
Creates the crime of aggravated felon in possession of a firearm when a person who has been convicted of a felony possesses three or more firearms or has certain prior convictions.
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Session
2026 Regular Session
At the request of
(at the request of Multnomah County District Attorney Nathan Vasquez)
Committee
Judiciary
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
67%
Oppose
33%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill creates a new crime in Oregon – aggravated felon in possession of a firearm – targeting individuals who have a felony conviction and possess three or more firearms, or who have prior convictions related to this offense. It defines aggravated felon in possession of a firearm as a Class B felony, and expands the penalties for possessing firearms by individuals with felony convictions. The bill also addresses specific circumstances, such as prior misdemeanor convictions or relief from disability, that could impact the application of these restrictions.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of House Bill 4096 express enthusiasm for the legislation, citing "common sense" as a driving force behind their support. The bill's proponents argue that it is necessary to elevate the crime classification for aggravated felons in possession of firearms, particularly in high-risk situations involving prohibited persons and firearms, in order to prioritize public safety. Many supporters believe that the bill aligns with existing policies from law enforcement associations and will help prevent criminals from owning guns, ultimately reducing the risk of dangerous situations involving felons in possession of firearms. By increasing penalties for felons possessing firearms, proponents argue that the bill will have a positive impact on law-abiding gun owners and support law enforcement efforts to address these critical public safety concerns.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4096 and HB 4145 express concerns about the potential negative impacts on small businesses, individuals, and law-abiding citizens' rights. Many that these bills create a two-tiered system favoring government insiders, while imposing excessive barriers to those exercising their constitutional rights, including the Second Amendment right to bear arms. They contend that HB 4145's gun control schemes worsen existing measures, such as Ballot Measure 114, and that HB 4096's broad language may lead to confusion and abuse, particularly in non-firearm related felony cases.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.