HB 4125
Prescribes methodology for the preparation of revenue estimates used in the budgeting process and as applicable to the surplus revenue refund process.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
47%
Oppose
53%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill outlines how Oregon’s Department of Revenue will prepare revenue estimates for the state budget and surplus refunds. It establishes a more detailed methodology for these estimates, requiring the department to use data projections based on nationally recognized models and recent financial trends. The bill also creates a new fund, the One-Time Emergencies and Finance Fund, to be used for specific purposes like reducing pension debt, funding capital projects, and handling emergencies. These changes will take effect 91 days after the legislative session concludes.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
The supporters of House Bill 4125 advocate for modernizing Oregon's revenue forecasting system to bring clarity, discipline, and stability to the state's budget. They emphasize the need for increased funding to address chronic underfunding of public schools, which would enable lawmakers to set up a more stable state budget and protect essential government services. The bill aims to improve fiscal stability by strengthening revenue estimates, reducing the risk of sudden funding reductions that harm frontline service providers, and providing more accurate projections and defined uses of 'delta dollars'. Supporters believe that modernizing the kicker system will create a more accurate prediction of revenue and a stable state budget, which is necessary for fulfilling basic social promises, such as quality public education, access to housing, food security, and medical care.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of the bill argue that Oregon's Kicker belongs to the taxpayers, emphasizing that it is a refund of excess taxes taken from residents. Many concern about government spending and request to stop allocating funds, citing excessive state spending as a major concern. Others argue that the state should return surplus funds to taxpayers who overpaid, as voters have explicitly stated through Measure 86 in 2020, and that the state is not broke and can afford to spend more on its challenges without reducing refunds. Testifiers also emphasize the importance of maintaining the current system, citing voter approval of Measure 86 and the need to prioritize expenses over government funding. Some argue that altering the Kicker formula would undermine public trust and reflect a lack of fiscal discipline, while others express strong opposition to the bill, calling it unfair to families and a "scam".
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.