HB 4134
Increases the state transient lodging tax.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
85%
Oppose
15%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill increases the state’s transient lodging tax, which is a tax on short-term rentals like hotels and vacation homes. The tax rate will increase to 1.5 percent, with portions allocated to various conservation and wildlife programs. The bill also changes the name of a wildlife fund account and specifies how the increased tax revenue will be distributed among the Oregon Tourism Commission, the Recovering Oregon’s Wildlife Fund, and several state agencies focused on fish and wildlife conservation, habitat restoration, and law enforcement. The tax increase will take effect on January 1, 2027.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 4134 emphasize the need for dedicated funding to conserve and protect Oregon's threatened wildlife, pollinators, and habitats. They argue that this investment will help mitigate climate change impacts, preserve natural environments, and promote coexistence with wolves. Proponents believe that a minimal tax on lodging can provide essential resources for conservation efforts, addressing habitat loss and degradation, and safeguarding imperiled species and their habitats. Many supporters highlight the benefits of protecting Oregon's wildlife, including bolstering the state's outdoor recreation and tourism economy, while also promoting environmental sustainability and community well-being.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4134 express concerns that increasing the statewide transient lodging tax would have a negative impact on Oregon's economy, particularly for small businesses and local economies. They argue that the tax increase would be counterproductive to supporting wildlife preservation and instead deter tourists from visiting the state, ultimately harming short-term vacation rental owners and accelerating travelers choosing more affordable destinations. Many testifiers also express concerns about the potential strain on shared resources and public lands, as well as the impact on rural areas and tourism industries in Central Oregon. Additionally, some argue that the bill's approach to funding conservation efforts would undermine sustainable tourism and Oregon's price competitiveness, making it harder for local businesses to attract visitors and maintain long-term viability.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.