HB 4135
Designates March 4th of each year as HPV Awareness Day.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
96%
Oppose
4%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill designates March 4th of each year as HPV Awareness Day in Oregon. It highlights the importance of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening in preventing these cancers, which are often asymptomatic. The bill also encourages public awareness campaigns and supports efforts to improve vaccination and screening rates, particularly in underserved communities. An emergency clause allows the law to take effect immediately upon passage.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Emerson Levy
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of designating March 4th as HPV Awareness Day in Oregon emphasize the importance of raising awareness about human papillomavirus (HPV) and its link to several cancers, which can be prevented with the HPV vaccine. The testifiers highlight the need for continued support of science and public awareness about HPV, a highly preventable disease, and advocate for increased education around cancer prevention and early detection. Many also stress the importance of addressing disparities in access to HPV vaccination and cervical screenings, particularly among rural, low-income, and communities of color, with the goal of promoting preventive measures to save lives and reduce healthcare costs. By designating March 4th as HPV Awareness Day, supporters aim to elevate education around cancer prevention and early detection, ultimately reducing the preventable cause of cancer caused by HPV.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Many the proposed short session, citing concerns that it would undermine the integrity of the legislative process. They argue that a short session should be reserved for addressing urgent technical issues, rather than being used to introduce new proposals or complex policy changes. This approach would help maintain the focus and deliberation required for meaningful legislation, and prevent rushed decisions that might have unintended consequences. By limiting the scope of the short session, it is possible to ensure that any proposed changes are thoroughly vetted and considered in a more traditional legislative setting.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.