HB 4138
Requires law enforcement agencies to require officers to wear uniforms with specified identifying information.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
98%
Oppose
2%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill requires Oregon law enforcement agencies to have officers wear uniforms that clearly display identifying information, such as their name, agency, and badge number. It also establishes procedures for agencies to ensure they aren’t assisting federal or out-of-state law enforcement in ways that violate specific policies. The bill includes provisions regarding attestations to prevent cooperation with restricted operations and prohibits the use of facial coverings by officers unless specifically authorized. It also addresses liability related to civil defense volunteers.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
James Manning Jr.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of immigrant justice measures emphasize the importance of prioritizing family unity, access to healthcare and education, and protection from abuse and discrimination. They advocate for policies like the 2026 Immigrant Justice Package, which aims to keep families together, protect children, and ensure access to essential services such as healthcare, food, and legal representation. Many testifiers highlight the need for transparency and accountability in law enforcement agencies, particularly regarding federal authorities' actions with US or out-of-state law enforcement, and support bills like HB 4138 that promote public safety while protecting civil liberties. They also express concern about federal law enforcement actions targeting marginalized communities and advocate for holding federal agents accountable for following the Constitution and local laws. Overall, supporters of immigrant justice measures seek to balance compassion with accountability, ensuring that families are protected from harm and that essential services are accessible to all.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4138 express concerns that the bill exceeds federal authority, ignores jurisdictional limits, and oversteps local and state authority into federal jurisdiction. They argue that the legislation would infringe on the autonomy of federal law enforcement agencies, compromise officer safety and effectiveness, and divert scarce tax dollars away from essential services. Many that the bill's provisions are impractical, potentially dangerous, and fail to address accountability measures that balance transparency with officer dignity. Some also express concerns about the bill's impact on Second Amendment gun rights, public safety, and the potential risks faced by law enforcement officers who are required to wear face masks or identify themselves when dealing with illegal alien removal.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.