HB 4140
Modifies the crime of criminal mischief in the first degree by expanding the types of telecommunications entities whose property may be subject to ORS 164.365.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
100%
Oppose
0%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill expands the crime of criminal mischief in the first degree to include telecommunications entities like public utilities, telecom providers, railroads, and medical facilities. It prohibits individuals from selling or trading nonferrous or commercial metal property to scrap metal businesses unless they are registered. The bill also requires scrap metal businesses to register as scrap metal sellers, check the registration status of buyers, sign up with a national theft alert system, and maintain detailed records of transactions. It aims to combat scrap metal theft and protect these vital infrastructure sectors.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
Cosponsor
E. Werner Reschke
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 4140 emphasize the growing threat of critical infrastructure damage and theft in Oregon, citing specific incidents and national statistics that underscore the need for enhanced public safety measures. Industry representatives, such as Jared Wiener from Lumen Technologies, highlight the impact of copper theft and vandalism on essential services, particularly affecting vulnerable customers reliant on landline phones. The broadband industry views HB 4140 as a crucial step in tackling telecommunication infrastructure crimes, which result in daily network disruptions and costly repairs, ultimately compromising essential services and public safety. By addressing this issue through collaboration across sectors, proponents believe the legislation can effectively combat the surge of copper theft and vandalism, safeguarding Oregon's critical infrastructure and vulnerable populations.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.