HB 4153
Allows counties to approve farm stores as nonfarm use on lands zoned for farm use.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take actionPublic sentiment
Support
30%
Oppose
70%
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill allows counties to approve farm stores as a permitted use on land zoned for farm use. A farm store is defined as a business that sells farm products produced on the farm or in the local agricultural area. The store must meet certain acreage and operational requirements, such as maintaining a significant portion of the land for farm use and limiting building size. It also allows for agri-tourism activities and farm-to-table meal operations within the store.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsors
David Brock Smith
Jeffrey Helfrich
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
Supporters of HB 4153 emphasize the importance of preserving rural experiences, family farms, and small businesses in Oregon. They highlight the benefits of agritourism, farm stores, and educational activities on agricultural land, which would allow farmers to diversify their income streams, host community events, and promote wholesome outdoor activities. Many personal connections to farming and value the role that small farms play in maintaining community connections, providing fresh produce, and contributing to local economies. They argue that removing excessive regulations would help small farms survive by reducing bureaucratic hurdles and increasing operational efficiency, ultimately benefiting Oregonians and future generations.
Source: Testimony Summaries
Arguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
Opponents of HB 4153 express concerns that the bill would undermine Oregon's unique land use system, allowing for non-farm commercial uses on agricultural land without sufficient safeguards to maintain a connection to agriculture. They argue that this would lead to the loss of farm land to entertainment and retail operations, disrupt rural communities, and harm small local farm stands, which are essential for connecting consumers with fresh produce and promoting community health. Opponents also believe that the bill's focus on larger markets would undermine the unique character of Oregon's agricultural landscape and favor large landowners over small farms, potentially pricing out new and younger farmers and increasing land costs.
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.