Cosmetic safety.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Chaptered
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill, known as the Musk Reduction Act, expands California’s restrictions on cosmetic ingredients to prohibit the manufacture, sale, and distribution of cosmetics containing certain types of musk chemicals, including ambrette, tibetene, moskene, and xylene. It also limits the amount of musk ketone allowed in cosmetic products. The bill incorporates changes from Senate Bill 39, making it effective only if both bills are enacted and this bill is last.
Key provisions
- Prohibits the sale of cosmetics containing musk ambrette, musk tibetene, musk moskene, and musk xylene.
- Limits the amount of musk ketone allowed in fine fragrance and oral products.
- Expands the list of prohibited PFAS and their salts.
- Requires warning statements on vaginal suppository products containing boric acid.
- Prohibits the sale of vaginal suppository products containing boric acid starting in 2035.
- The bill’s changes are contingent on the enactment of Senate Bill 39.
- Defines ‘oral products’ for the purpose of the bill.
- Allows for technically unavoidable trace quantities of certain ingredients, provided they stem from impurities.
Who is affected
- Cosmetic manufacturers
- Cosmetic retailers
- Consumers of cosmetics
- The cosmetic industry
- Individuals using vaginal suppositories
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours