Best value procurement: school districts and county offices of education.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Chaptered
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill modifies California’s public contract code to allow school districts to use a ‘best value’ procurement method for projects exceeding $1 million. Initially, it focuses on the Los Angeles Unified School District, requiring a pilot program through December 31, 2025, with a reporting requirement. Subsequently, the bill expands this authorization to all other school districts, allowing them to utilize this method before December 31, 2030, with a reporting requirement until January 1, 2030. The bill includes provisions for evaluating bids based on qualifications and cost, and outlines procedures for awarding contracts when the initial bidder fails to execute a contract.
Key provisions
- Extends the pilot program for the Los Angeles Unified School District to use best value procurement.
- Authorizes all other school districts to use best value procurement for projects over $1 million, effective December 31, 2030.
- Requires school districts to report on the use of best value procurement to the Legislature.
- Establishes criteria for evaluating bids, including price and qualifications.
- Provides a process for awarding contracts if the initial bidder fails to execute a contract.
- Specifies retention proceeds limitations for contractors.
- Requires prequalification of bidders and emphasizes the use of a skilled workforce.
- Defines key terms related to best value procurement.
Who is affected
- School districts
- County offices of education
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours