Urban equestrian inclusion zones.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Appropriations
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill would allow cities, counties, or city and county governments to establish ‘urban equestrian inclusion zones’ to voluntarily restrict land use for equestrian activities. These zones would enable these local governments to enter into contracts with landowners to limit equestrian use on their property. The bill includes a sunset provision, prohibiting new contracts or renewals after January 1, 2029, and aims to balance housing needs with the preservation of California’s equestrian heritage. It also addresses how restricting land use for equestrian activities is considered a reduction in land use intensity for purposes of housing regulations.
Key provisions
- Authorizes cities, counties, and city/county governments to create urban equestrian inclusion zones.
- Allows for voluntary contracts with landowners to restrict land use for equestrian activities.
- Prohibits new contracts or renewals after January 1, 2029.
- Defines ‘equestrian activities’ and ‘equestrian activity use’ for zoning purposes.
- Specifies requirements for contracts, including minimum acreage and restrictions on dwellings.
- Includes a requirement that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern.
- Addresses how restricting land use for equestrian activities is considered a reduction in land use intensity.
- Establishes a sunset date for the new provisions.
Who is affected
- Cities
- Counties
- Landowners
- Equestrian communities
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours