Mobilehome parks: termination of tenancy.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Housing and Community Development
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill modifies California’s Mobilehome Residency Law to change how mobilehome park management can terminate a tenant’s tenancy. Instead of solely relying on conduct causing ‘substantial annoyance,’ management can now terminate a tenancy for failure to comply with local ordinances or state laws, or for certain criminal convictions. The bill also clarifies procedures for nonpayment of rent and outlines requirements for notifying homeowners about proposed changes in park use.
Key provisions
- Management can terminate a tenancy for failure to comply with local ordinances or state laws.
- Management can terminate a tenancy for conduct by the homeowner or resident causing substantial annoyance to other residents, park staff, or park employees.
- Management can terminate a tenancy for certain criminal convictions (prostitution, specific Penal Code violations, or felony drug offenses) if the act occurred on the park premises.
- Clarified procedures for nonpayment of rent, including a three-day notice and potential cure options.
- Requires 60 days’ written notice for a change of park use, with additional notice requirements for changes requiring permits.
- Requires notification to homeowners regarding proposed changes of use.
- Operative date of February 1, 2025.
- Specifies definitions related to financial institutions and mobilehome dealers.
Who is affected
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours