Mobilehome parks: emergency preparedness.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Appropriations
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill updates emergency preparedness requirements for mobilehome parks in California. It increases the annual fee paid by mobilehome park owners to the Department of Housing and Community Development or local enforcement agencies to $10 per lot, up from $4, until January 1, 2030. The bill also mandates that parks with 50 or more units have a designated person available to respond to emergencies and requires the development and posting of comprehensive emergency preparedness plans, approved by the Standardized Emergency Management System Advisory Board. Furthermore, it establishes a process for enforcement agencies to ensure compliance and penalize parks that fail to meet these requirements.
Key provisions
- Increases the annual per-lot fee for mobilehome parks from $4 to $10 until January 1, 2030.
- Requires parks with 50 or more units to have a designated person available to respond to emergencies.
- Mandates the development and posting of comprehensive emergency preparedness plans.
- Requires emergency plans to be approved by the Standardized Emergency Management System Advisory Board.
- Requires annual notification to residents on how to access the emergency preparedness plan.
- Requires parks to maintain accessible fire hydrants and gas systems.
- Establishes a process for enforcement agencies to ensure compliance and impose penalties.
- Requires a written statement under penalty of perjury if violations are not corrected within 60 days.
Who is affected
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours