California Environmental Quality Act: judicial streamlining: state of emergency: wildfire.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Chaptered
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill streamlines the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process for projects responding to wildfire damage. Specifically, it requires lead agencies to prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the administrative process for projects in areas declared under state of emergency due to wildfires, and aims to resolve legal challenges to project approvals within 270 days. The bill also mandates that project applicants cover the costs of court proceedings and requires the Judicial Council to establish implementing rules. It excludes projects exempt from CEQA and those proposed after the state of emergency declaration is rescinded.
Key provisions
- Requires lead agencies to prepare a record of proceedings concurrently for wildfire-related projects in declared emergency areas.
- Sets a 270-day deadline for resolving legal challenges to project approvals.
- Requires project applicants to pay court costs associated with legal proceedings.
- Mandates the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court to implement the provisions.
- Excludes projects exempt from CEQA and those proposed after the state of emergency is rescinded.
- Projects must be consistent with applicable zoning and land use ordinances.
- Applies to projects that maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged by wildfire.
Who is affected
- Local government agencies
- Developers of wildfire-damaged property
- Environmental review boards
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
17 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours